Categories without Uniqueness of cod and dom
نویسنده
چکیده
where ◦o1,o2,o3 : 〈o2,o3〉×〈o1,o2〉 → 〈o1,o3〉 that satisfies usual conditions (associativity and the existence of the identities). This approach is closer to the way in which categories are presented in homological algebra (e.g. [1], pp.58-59). We do not assume that 〈o1,o2〉’s are mutually disjoint. If f is simultaneously a morphism from o1 to o2 and o1 to o2 (o1 6= o1) than different compositions are used (◦o1,o2,o3 or ◦o′1,o2,o3 ) to compose it with a morphism g from o2 to o3. The operation g · f has actually six arguments (two visible and four hidden: three objects and the category). We introduce some simple properties of categories. Perhaps more than necessary. It is partially caused by the formalization. The functional categories are characterized by the following properties:
منابع مشابه
Categorial Categories and Slice Categories
Let D1, D2, D be non empty sets and let x be an element of [: [:D1, D2 :], D :]. Then x1,1 is an element of D1. Then x1,2 is an element of D2. Let D1, D2 be non empty sets and let x be an element of [:D1, D2 :]. Then x2 is an element of D2. Next we state the proposition (1) Let C, D be category structures. Suppose the category structure of C = the category structure of D. If C is category-like,...
متن کاملIntroduction to Categories and Functors
The category is introduced as an ordered 5-tuple of the form 〈O,M,dom,cod, ·, id〉 where O (objects) and M (morphisms) are arbitrary nonempty sets, dom and cod map M onto O and assign to a morphism domain and codomain, · is a partial binary map from M×M to M (composition of morphisms), id applied to an object yields the identity morphism. We define the basic notions of the category theory such a...
متن کاملOn the Categories Without Uniqueness of cod and dom . Some Properties of the Morphisms and the Functors
In this paper C denotes a category and o1, o2, o3 denote objects of C. Let C be a non empty category structure with units and let o be an object of C. Observe that 〈o, o〉 is non empty. The following propositions are true: (1) Let v be a morphism from o1 to o2, u be a morphism from o1 to o3, and f be a morphism from o2 to o3. If u = f · v and f −1 · f = id(o2) and 〈o1, o2〉 6= ∅ and 〈o2, o3〉 6= ∅...
متن کاملProducts in Categories without Uniqueness of cod and dom
The papers [10], [6], [1], [8], [2], [3], [4], [9], [12], [11], and [5] provide the terminology and notation for this paper. In this paper I denotes a set and E denotes a non empty set. Let us mention that every binary relation which is empty is also ∅-defined. Let C be a graph. We say that C is functional if and only if: (Def. 1) For all objects a, b of C holds 〈a, b〉 is functional. Let us con...
متن کاملOpposite Categories and Contravariant Functors
The opposite category of a category, contravariant functors and duality functors are defined. Next we state the proposition (1) the objects of C, the morphisms of C, the cod-map of C, the dom-map of C, (the composition of C),the id-map of C is a category. Let us consider C. The functor C op yielding a strict category is defined by the condition (Def. 1). (Def. 1) C op = the objects of C, the mo...
متن کامل